|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.6±0.6 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
4.9±0.3 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.9±0.3 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.7±0.5 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.8±0.4 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.8±0.4 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
I found the speaker’s enthusiasm infectious. |
• |
Great speaker,
grant learning. Very informative. |
• |
Outstanding! |
• |
Excellent
presenter and seminar! Time well spent and information extremely
useful. The presenter made a very dry subject enjoyable! |
• |
Very nice
presentation-interesting and easy to follow, easy to keep
attention, makes me look forward to grant writing and applying
these techniques. |
| • |
Excellent
presentation. Opened my eyes, mind and heart. A spectacular
summary of tips! This seminar should be offered at least once
a year. |
| • |
I loved this
seminar |
| • |
The program
was excellent. I am now excited about starting my own grant
proposal. |
• |
The presenter
is an energetic speaker who is very knowledgeable in the field. |
| • |
Five star
review: I would “fund” his presentation/Kept it light-hearted/Engaged
the audience . . . event after lunch/A must see seminar/One
of the best grant writing workshops I’ve seen/NIH, here I
come!!! |
|
|
|
