The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
Very good and lively seminar with a lot of useful information and examples. |
• |
There were helpful tips that I learned from the presentation. The speaker’s style was very clear and easy to follow. I appreciated the presentation and her precision, scope and depth. |
• |
Very well constructed seminar with a lot of useful information. |
• |
Great speaker! Knowledgeable and experienced. |
• |
The handouts are very helpful. I also appreciate having a workbook that I can use in the future. The presenter did a great job of pointing out the differences between applications for K-awards, R01, etc. |
• |
The knowledge provided today will be helpful in my resubmission. Overall, great! |
| • |
Very useful!! For people at all levels. |
• |
Great that the presenter has a scientific background. Gave specific detail on "how to" - section by section; very helpful. Gave lot of examples/real–life illustrations. |
• |
Excellent overview of the grant process. |
• |
The workshop gave many useful and practical information on grant writing. The speaker was so engaging and that kept the attention up until the end of the session. |
• |
Great seminar with hands on information on writing a grant. Very useful for my level. |
• |
The seminar content was highly informative and the accompanying materials are excellent. |
• |
Extremely helpful and encouraging. I think this should be mandatory for postdocs, at least part of BU’s training for postdocs. |
• |
Effective anecdotes and examples. Workbook looks like it will be very helpful! |
• |
Very informative!! |
• |
Excellent Presenter! |
