|
|
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
|
 |
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.8±0.4 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
5.0±0.0 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.9±0.2 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.8±0.4 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.8±0.4 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.9±0.3 |
|
|
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
You fill an incredibly important need and offer a 5-star service. Thank you . |
• |
Thank you for a well prepared presentation. |
• |
Great. |
• |
A++. |
| • |
Excellent training session. |
| • |
Once again, excellent course, very informative and an essential stepping stone in the beginning of my research career. All post-doc's should hear you in their first year . |
• |
Excellent! Very practical and illustrative. |
• |
Excellent presentation. |
• |
Very useful/ helpful. |
• |
Many thanks for a wonderful presentation! |
• |
Very well done. Thanks. |
• |
Excellent presentation. |
|
|
Testimonials
| |
This
is an excellent workshop, and I learned a lot from this program.
Very nice job, thank you!
All faculty should attend at least once!
As a junior faculty having just attended my first NSF review panel,
I found this presentation to be very sequentially and logically
outlined and detailed. I feel like this presentation has given
me a good plan of action for my upcoming proposals.
I am currently a postdoc but found it extremely useful. I think
a lot of the material also applies well to writing a research
and teaching plan.
Terrific presentation, even though I’ve written a funded NIH R01
grant I found the workshop very practical.
|
|
