|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.9±0.3 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
5.0±0.0 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.8±0.4 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.7±0.6 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.8±0.4 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.9±0.3 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
Presenter was a great speaker, knowledgeable, able to answer questions. |
• |
This seminar was really great for my research grant application. I’ll recommend this to my colleagues. |
• |
Excellent information, extremely helpful to someone who is very early in their career! |
• |
Please continue to offer this opportunity! Was an outstanding review of the process. |
| • |
A great overview and discussion of what makes a competitive K-award application. I hope this series is offered again next year! |
| • |
It was so good; and thorough, clear and inspiring. Thank you very much. |
| • |
Excellent! |
|
|
Testimonials
| |
This
is an excellent workshop, and I learned a lot from this program.
Very nice job, thank you!
All faculty should attend at least once!
As a junior faculty having just attended my first NSF review panel,
I found this presentation to be very sequentially and logically
outlined and detailed. I feel like this presentation has given
me a good plan of action for my upcoming proposals.
I am currently a postdoc but found it extremely useful. I think
a lot of the material also applies well to writing a research
and teaching plan.
Terrific presentation, even though I’ve written a funded NIH R01
grant I found the workshop very practical.
|
|
