|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.9±0.4 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
5.0±0.0 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.9±0.3 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.9±0.4 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.8±0.6 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.9±0.4 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
Great presentation of practical affects of Career Development. |
• |
Consistent with past experience, the workshop was very informative and timely for me and the stage of my research career. I plan to submit an application in the near future. The workshop “opened my eyes” to the important and necessary steps I need to take to be successful. It also provided insight around the key role of the mentoring relationship and the characteristics of a good mentor. |
• |
Excellent very useful, would highly recommend to others. |
• |
Extremely informative regarding “how to” will make a big difference in my approach. Wonderful practical tips provided to maximize K application. |
|
|
Testimonials
| |
This
is an excellent workshop, and I learned a lot from this program.
Very nice job, thank you!
All faculty should attend at least once!
As a junior faculty having just attended my first NSF review panel,
I found this presentation to be very sequentially and logically
outlined and detailed. I feel like this presentation has given
me a good plan of action for my upcoming proposals.
I am currently a postdoc but found it extremely useful. I think
a lot of the material also applies well to writing a research
and teaching plan.
Terrific presentation, even though I’ve written a funded NIH R01
grant I found the workshop very practical.
|
|
