|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.4±0.7 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
4.7±0.5 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.8±0.5 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.4±0.8 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.5±0.7 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.3±0.8 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
This is an excellent workshop, and I learned a lot from this
program. |
• |
Very nice
job, thank you! |
• |
All faculty
should attend at least once! |
• |
As a junior
faculty having just attended my first NSF review panel, I
found this presentation to be very sequentially and logically
outlined and detailed. I feel like this presentation has given
me a good plan of action for my upcoming proposals. |
| • |
I am currently
a postdoc but found it extremely useful. I think a lot of
the material also applies well to writing a research and teaching
plan. |
| • |
Terrific
presentation, even though I’ve written a funded NIH R01 grant
I found the workshop very practical. |
|
|
Testimonials
| |
This
is an excellent workshop, and I learned a lot from this program.
Very nice job, thank you!
All faculty should attend at least once!
As a junior faculty having just attended my first NSF review panel,
I found this presentation to be very sequentially and logically
outlined and detailed. I feel like this presentation has given
me a good plan of action for my upcoming proposals.
I am currently a postdoc but found it extremely useful. I think
a lot of the material also applies well to writing a research
and teaching plan.
Terrific presentation, even though I’ve written a funded NIH R01
grant I found the workshop very practical.
|
|
