|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.7±0.4 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
4.9±0.2 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.9±0.3 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.8±0.4 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.8±0.4 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.9±0.3 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
Excellent
presentation, certainly would be great to have it on a regular
basis; I will come next year again. |
• |
The information
contained in the workshop should be very beneficial to me,
especially as I prepare to write grants this semester. I thought
that all the topics on the schedule were covered in sufficient
detail and in an interesting manner. I will be recommending
this seminar to my colleagues. |
• |
Excellent job. |
• |
Wonderful
seminar. I have learned a lot. |
• |
I wish we had
this available to us during my first year at Clemson. [The
presenter] breaks down the huge job of writing a grant and
makes it seem so easy! I’m motivated to do it now! |
• |
Great presentation
– motivation for topic, style, etc. Very useful material.
It was very helpful to see this topic treated as a “science”
instead of the black art it would appear to be. |
| • |
Like it very
much! |
• |
The best seminar
on proposal writing I’ve ever seen. I don’t see how it could
be improved. [The presenter] does a great job and is an interesting
and entertaining speaker, and very educational. This was a
very beneficial use of my time. |
• |
[The presenter’s]
very logical presentation helped me understand this very complicated
process. I feel infected with his enthusiasm. I hope I’ll
write a good grant. Thank you. |
|
|
|
