|
|
The University of Georgia
|
 |
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.9±0.3 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
5.0±0.0 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
5.0±0.0 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.7±0.6 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.7±0.5 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.9±0.3 |
|
|
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
Well done, professionally delivered and practical. Kudos. |
• |
Excellent, thoroughly covered topics I was interested in. As a graduate student all the information needed was provided in one complete seminar. Everything was explained in a clear logical manner. |
• |
The real life examples are very useful/helpful, such as that about “helpful vs. unhelpful title”. Thank you! |
• |
The seminar overall was very informative. I especially enjoyed the information on the websites available to check current government funding. |
• |
Very informative presentation. I have learned a lot from this workshop. |
| • |
Great job. I would recommend this to everyone especially new PhD’s and those who are in the terminal stages of PhD. Must do seminar/ workshop session. |
• |
Great job!! |
|
|
|
