Programs Include:








Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


Hunter College of CUNY

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.8±0.5
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
5.0±0.0
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.9±0.3
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.8±0.5
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
5.0±0.0
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.7±0.6
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):

I can not write a high enough rating for this workshop.  The speaker was so well prepared and also had applied for and received funding.  I hope this seminar series can be a regular part of faculty development.
Very informative, practical.
I felt that this program was very beneficial.  I would definitely recommend it to others.   The most helpful aid was the examples included at the end of the packet.
Speaker overall rating was excellent!  Very thorough, speaks clearly, takes time with the material to make sure that it is understood and that the key points are emphasized.  It was a pleasure having this instructor give this seminar, very knowledgeable and much expertise in the field.
Thanks for the advice!
It was very informative to also hear about the review process. Hearing about the process of review at NSF and NIH drive home the importance of clear and concise writing skills.
Even though I have attended several grant writing workshops, I learned more tips that will be able to be applicable to my grant applications.
I found the workshop very useful as always.  I always find the updated advice very useful.

Testimonials