Programs Include:



Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback



Mayo Clinic

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.7±0.7
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
4.9±0.3
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.8±0.5
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.6±0.6
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.8±0.5
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.7±0.5
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):

The speaker] was a very dynamic presenter—came across very well even by video conference.
This was a great seminar and I learned a lot.
The presenter made it very enjoyable and entertaining. I would say I had “excellent enthusiasm” for this seminar.
The program was outstanding overall. [The presenter] was an energetic lecturer who presented the material well.
I gained so much knowledge today! I am going to take my class materials to our division chair and recommend this class to anyone joining our division. Thank you.
I am starting my 4th year of graduate school and this information is invaluable to me. I feel as though I’ve learned a great deal. I look forward to applying it to a predoctorate grant. I plan to apply for from the DOD. Thank you so much! P.S. The newspaper grant analogy is fantastic.
I thoroughly enjoyed the seminar. Very informative. Insight provided on the reviewer’s experience and psychology.
I have taken advanced writing courses so some of this was review. I needed to know how to apply this to grant writing, and I certainly obtained that today. Thank you.
This would be a wonderful course for all post-docs and new research/clinical research staff

Testimonials