Programs Include:







Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback



University of Miami

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.8±0.7
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
5.0±0.0
The presenter was responsive to questions:
5.0±0.0
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
5.0±0.0
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
5.0±0.0
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
5.0±0.0
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):

Presenter was engaging, informative and organized.
Though I am in the humanities, I felt that this was a great way to understand the grant process. It helped me understand what traps I have walked into with previous grants I have written.
Outstanding! Recommend to every researcher.
Excellent! Engaging and very informative!
Great seminar! Good balance of political considerations and the nuts and bolts of grant writing.
Extremely informative.
Very compelling and well balanced. [The presenter] served an invaluable purpose.
This was a very helpful presentation for either new investigators or more established ones in need of a refresher. I think the presenter's most compelling attribute is his apparent credibility. It made the difference between it being a presentation based solely on salesmanship and one that was a convincing discourse acceptable to (approval) academics. Outstanding!.
Excellent program, excellent teacher, very helpful.
Presenter very knowledgeable.
Very informative. Thanks for a great presentation.
Useful, full of truly practical advice, do's and don'ts. Junior faculty should be required to attend.
Wonderful seminar.

Testimonials