Programs Include:



Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


University of North Dakota

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.5±0.5
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
4.9±0.2
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.8±0.4
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.7±0.5
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.8±0.5
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.7±0.6
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
•
This was a very helpful seminar and the presenter did an excellent job. I believe that I can really do a better job on my grant revision to the NSF that I am planning. Good session!
•
The speaker was very entertaining and informative. Best workshop I have ever been to.
•
I learned a lot. I have to write a grant for my doctoral comps, but there is no formal training available to us. I feel much more prepared for this comp and know that I would not have known the majority of the mechanics of grant writing without this seminar.
•
I really enjoyed this seminar, I learned more today than I did in the past week! I wish more of my classmates would have been here for this. I hope to see you come back to North Dakota.
•
The speaker was wonderful and gave me the chance to ask questions during the break. Presenter’s use of anecdotes and analogies were quite useful.
•
Much more fantastic than I anticipated
•
Good overview with successful detail! Great examples!!
•
Speaker was very knowledgeable, great speaking ability. I would like too have him on my review committee.
•
Great job would recommend to others.
•
Best grant-writing seminar I have ever attended. Specific ideas about what works.
•
The speaker did an outstanding job of presenting.

Testimonials