|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.8±0.5 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
4.9±0.3 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
5.0±0.0 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.8±0.4 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.9±0.3 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.9±0.3 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
Just the right input on the more subtle points. |
• |
As a post-doc I can take ideas to position myself to apply for this in the future. |
• |
Very informative seminar. Without any doubts, it is a very helpful experience. Thank you very much. |
|
|
Testimonials
| |
I just can't say enough about the job [the presenter] does for new faculty. His methods work, and I cannot wait to implement what I learned today. As an engineer, educational changes are on the rise and this CAREER seminar is very timely. Thank you OGRD for organizing another excellent [Grant Writers' Seminar & Workshop] program.
I hope that we will have this workshop in future years for all of our new faculties. I think this workshop is a must that every newcomer here at WSU should attend!!!
Very informative on the key point- the role of the educational component in the proposal.
Clearly deliberated purpose, scope and educational/research, foci/integration of career awards. Thank you for providing this opportunity..
|
|
