|
|
Pfizer,
Inc. - Berkeley, California
|
 |
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.6±0.6 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
5.0±0.0 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.9±0.4 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.5±0.8 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.7±0.5 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.6±0.7 |
|
|
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file): |
| |
Excellent session informative and with specific and detailed
advice and hints for improving grantsmanship. Would highly
recommend for all starting investigators! |
|
Outstanding
seminar I have used the written materials to assist with
fellowship applications before I had significant preliminary
data. This approach has helped me get one fellowship award.
I will now use it to try to move to the next level of funding
. |
|
This type
of class should be offered in medical and graduate schools. |
|
|
The best presentation
on the topic Ive had over the last eight years since completing
my PhD. |
|
|
Very informative
seminar and very well implemented slides and presentation.
Well worth the time spent! Would recommend seminar highly
to other people interested in obtaining extramural funding. |
|
|
Excellent
speaker provides information at appropriate pace with highlighting.
Useful points of emphasis, material was relevant and practical. |
|
Thank you!
Will recommend this program to all investigators. |
|
This one day
seminar was incredibly influential on my future approach to
tackle the grants. I found it truly useful. |
|
Never dry
or boring; used humor to keep us attentive. Great examples,
analogies liked the newspaper-writing analogy. |
|
Well presented,
informative, and practical thank you! |
|
|
|
