|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.4±0.9 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
4.9±0.2 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.8±0.3 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.7±0.5 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.8±0.4 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.4±0.8 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
One of the most interesting lectures I have attended. The speaker managed to make talking about writing both interesting and funny. |
• |
Third, fourth and fifth year students really appreciated this workshop. Thank you very much. Examples, substance and reason were exactly what were needed. Time was taken to explain key areas of publication. |
• |
I thoroughly enjoyed this seminar – I learned more about publishing research data and how to handle conflict of interest. |
• |
The speaker was very informative. His ability to keep the audience’s attention through the use of examples and humor was very welcomed. I think this would be a helpful seminar in the future for both faculty and students. Thank you very much for the experience. |
| • |
This seminar was highly significant to my career as a biomedical graduate student. As I am currently preparing a grant, I was able to identify errors just from his presentation which can be easily corrected before I submit it for review. Also during the length of the seminar, the speaker was able to maintain the attention of the attendees and he also stayed on the topic and avoided all irrelevant information. Great seminar! |
| • |
This would be a great one-time seminar for first or second year students. The information was very well presented, timely, and important. Thanks! |
| • |
Great information! |
| • |
This was very timely for me as an entering PhD student. Thank you and come back for a grant seminar! |
| • |
This program should be required for all graduate students and postdocs to attend at least one time during their tenure here at Meharry. I believe that it should be given once a year or once every two years. It was very informative and helpful. |
| • |
Very useful information. Speaker was knowledgeable about topics discussed. Should be invited back for future students. |
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
“I enjoyed this thoroughly. It was specific and helpful, encouraging and challenging. [The presenter's] energy was amazing!”
“Excellent program!! I appreciated [the presenter's] sense of humor and easy-going presentation style. Excellent material!”
“This was a fantastic overview of ‘how to' develop, write and publish a scientific paper. I would recommend this course to anyone involved in publishing.”
“Good pace, good examples for reinforcemement.”
“Excellent presentation! I would recommend it to all of my colleagues.”
|
|
