|
|
UNIVERSITY
OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER
|
 |
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.6±0.6 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
4.9±0.1 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.9±0.2 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.8±0.3 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.9±0.2 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.8±0.4 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
|
|
Excellent!! |
|
Best grant
seminar presented at UMMC. |
|
It was great.
Extremely helpful. |
|
I feel like
my time was well spent and the handouts were great. Great
presenter. |
| |
Most useful
lecture of my life. I hope I will see this lecturer every
year just to reinforce good habits. |
| |
Wonderful,
I feel inspired. |
| |
Great presentation
key points about writing for a reviewer who is on a study
section well worth my time. |
| |
Well done
very informative. |
| |
Excellent program.
Very helpful. |
|
|
Testimonials

|
|
[The presenter] had a powerful, yet friendly presentation style that is not only hugely informative, but also reassuring that obtaining funding is feasible. His willingness to answer questions at the end of the session on broader topics than just grant writing was a pleasant and appreciated boon to the seminar.
Wayne State University
One of the most dynamic and informative seminars I've attended at NIH. Hopefully there can be an increase in similar seminars in the future to accommodate all those who wish to attend. I would highly recommend this seminar to all.
National Institutes of Health
This has been fabulous! It's definitely been worth the time. The timing has been good for me, too, as I'm just now writing my full PhD proposal. I will be editing it this weekend with [the presenter's] tips and recommendations in mind!
Oregon Health and Sciences University
|
|