The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
|
|
He was an excellent presenter, extremely informative. If the
entire WSU family adopted his principles or model we would
be AWESOME. |
|
This seminar
was excellent and very informative.
The information and
materials provided will be very useful and immediately relevant
to my work and has fired my enthusiasm to get started on an-other
grant application. |
|
I really did
appreciate this training. My only regret is, I did not get
this kind of training before writing my proposal. |
|
Loved the
anecdotes about the NIH review process! [The presenter] had
an excellent level of energy and enthusiasm for the topic
very receptive to audience questions. Wish I had attended
this semi-nar 3 years ago! |
| |
The presenter]
has a powerful, yet friendly presentation style that is not
only hugely informative, but also reassuring that obtaining
funding is feasible. His willingness to answer questions at
the end of the session on broader topics than just grant writing
was a pleasant and appreciated boost to the seminar. |
| |
The seminar
was wonderful. I am very pleased to have been a participant.
[The presenter] was very easy to understand. The materials
from the seminar will prove to be very useful to me. |
| |
This was
an incredibly helpful seminar. |
| |
The information
presented and the style with which it was presented was
exceptional and highly enlightening. Thank you. |
| |
Great seminar,
with lots of useful information and tips that you probably
wont find anywhere else. |
| |
The information
provided was extraordinarily helpful. In addition, the sample
documents will help in future proposal development. |
|
This was one
of the best presentations that I have ever attended. The information
was incredibly practical. This will help to level the playing
field and re-energize the process. |
|
This seminar
was extremely informative and should be a requirement in any
post-doctoral training. Thank you for the candid question
and answer session [at the end of the program]. |
|
Excellent job
weaving between the different funding agencies (NIH, NSF,
etc.). Good to get the be-hind-the-scenes perspective of
grant reviews and the application process. |