Programs Include:








Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


State University Of New York at Buffalo

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.4±0.8
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
4.9±0.3
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.9±0.3
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.5±0.7
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.6±0.7
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.6±0.6
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
•
Very informative and an excellent template for grant writing.
•
[The presenter] was an engaging, enthusiastic, and energetic speaker. I appreciate her experience and expertise in grant writing.
•
Excellent start to helping those of us who have been trying to get an NIH grant for years.
•
Great presenter, engaging and able to answer all questions. Great/helpful and in-depth handout and workbook will be useful to instruct other PI’s and research administration on how to help write effective grants.
•
Entertaining and informative – rare combination.
•
Presenter very approachable at break with individual questions.
•
Not only a good course on grantsmanship, it also helps junior researchers prioritize their efforts on hypothesis driven experiments.
•
Highly useful and informative.
•
I bought the workbook to help with the new NIH format and it was a great investment. Great comments on writing and organization. Seminar reinforces workbook.
•
Overall, this workshop was a good use of my time.
•
Presenter is amazing, well prepared–great anecdotal. Content; excellent and very informative.
•
An excellent workshop! I would love to have her back to consult on my grant application.
•
In addition to learning helpful tips on grant writing, your seminar was very informative on different types of funding. I have only written a small pre-doc grant thus far in my career and feel that I now know several ways that I could improve on this for the next time I write a grant. I found the handouts very helpful.
•
Well organized and delivered.
•
Excellent workshop presented in an entertaining and highly informative manner. Worth the money and very helpful for faculty and postdocs.
•
Love this!
•
Excellent speaker, very engaging and motivating.
•
Overall quality of program is very high.

Testimonials


National Institutes of Health

American University

Women’s Reproductive Health Research Program – Brown University

Duke University School of Medicine

University of Wyoming

University of Wyoming

Boston University

Tulane University

FASEB and Howard University

Western University of Health Sciences

University of Minnesota

University of Kentucky

South Florida University

Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research

University of Cincinnati

FASEB and Xavier University of Louisiana

University of Nebraska – Lincoln

University of Alabama Huntsville

Wayne State University

Brown University

University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

University of Illinois at Chicago

Michigan State University Ag Bio Research

University of Iowa

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

State University of New York at Buffalo

Mayo Clinic

Tufts University

Wayne State University

Washington State University

Georgia Southern University

California State University, Chico Research Foundation