Programs Include:








Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


Washington State University

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.6±0.6
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
4.9±0.4
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.9±0.3
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.5±0.7
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.9±0.5
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.6±0.6
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
•
First such workshop that really explained how to write and what was expected.
•
Outstanding workshop. Concise and highly relevant. I am now better equipped to interpret reviewer/panel summaries of unsuccessful proposals, and have a format for writing more successful proposals.
•
Very enlightening and informative, It makes me excited to apply for a grant!
•
I thought that there was excellent advice just on clear writing. Given the broad audience, it was an excellent formula that I could apply to multiple agencies.
•
As a new PI, I found the workshop extremely helpful.
•
The seminar is greatly appreciated. I’m an inexperienced faculty and after this seminar, I feel like I now know where to begin. Thank you for this excellent workshop.
•
[The presenter] is an engaging speaker and his presentation seemed to cover the topic with an appropriated combination of broad strokes and relevant details.
•
Well informed speaker. I feel confident he is pointing me in the right direction!
•
This is the single, best grant writing seminar I’ve been to. I will recommend this to colleagues. I wish I knew this information fifteen years ago.
•
Excellent presenter and definitely worth hearing again!
•
[The presenter] is an excellent speaker. Information presented was very informative and applicable.
•
Really good job, very informative!
•
This was an extraordinary seminar that significantly expanded my knowledge of the fundamentals of proposal preparation to the application of these fundamentals to real applications.
•
Very beneficial.
•
Excellent presentation.

Testimonials


National Institutes of Health

American University

Women’s Reproductive Health Research Program – Brown University

Duke University School of Medicine

University of Wyoming

University of Wyoming

Boston University

Tulane University

FASEB and Howard University

Western University of Health Sciences

University of Minnesota

University of Kentucky

South Florida University

Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

Michigan Institute for Clinical & Health Research

University of Cincinnati

FASEB and Xavier University of Louisiana

University of Nebraska – Lincoln

University of Alabama Huntsville

Wayne State University

Brown University

University of Wisconsin Milwaukee

University of Illinois at Chicago

Michigan State University Ag Bio Research

University of Iowa

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

State University of New York at Buffalo

Mayo Clinic

Tufts University

Wayne State University

Washington State University

Georgia Southern University

California State University, Chico Research Foundation