Programs Include:








Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.6±0.5
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
5.0±0.0
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.9±0.2
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.8±0.3
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.9±0.1
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.8±0.4
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
•
Having a strategy (system) for developing grants is going to be extremely helpful.
•
Critical details covered. I would highly recommend this seminar to be delivered regularly to all faculty/staff/student development programs. Great!!
•
I really appreciated the clarity of the presentation. I walked away knowing exactly what I need to do in order to increase my probability of success.
•
Excellent job!
•
This is a great seminar. I came to the seminar with some suspicion. I was afraid that it would be more relevant to your specific field, but I found that this is exactly what I need.
•
Motivating and inspiring. Speaker has a talent to keep participants interested despite long format. Encouraged me to pursue grant writing regardless of status/credentials. After the presentation I feel confident and enthused about pursuing ideas.
•
Excellent presenter. Learned a lot!
•
I think that all faculty who are planning grant proposals would benefit greatly from this method/workshop. It is unique and extremely well developed.
•
It is a terrific training opportunity. I greatly appreciate it.
•
The speaker provided just the right amount of material in a well-paced humorous manner. He was very receptive to questions and thorough in his answers. Excellent resources (manuals, websites) were provided. His emphasis on recent NIH changes is very valuable.
•
[The presenter] did an excellent job of integrating new NIH format into presentation and suggestions on how to manage the new format.
•
I am grateful that all the information from today’s talk is available in an easy-to-read booklet. I am sure that I will refer to this booklet in the future.

Testimonials


National Institutes of Health

University of Iowa

University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

State University of New York at Buffalo

Mayo Clinic

Tufts University

Wayne State University

Washington State University

Georgia Southern University

California State University, Chico Research Foundation

University of the District of Columbia

Mississippi State University

Temple University

FASEB and the University of Texas at Brownsville

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Duke University

Boston University

Children's Mercy Healthcare

University of Wyoming

University of Michigan

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

University of South Florida, School of Medicine

University of Toledo

Iowa State University

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

University of Cincinnati