Programs Include:








Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


The University of Wisconsin-Madison

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.8±0.4
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
5.0±0.0
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.8±0.4
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.8±0.5
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.9±0.3
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.9±0.4
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
•
Crucial information provided that will be useful for the rest of my career. Dynamic speaker, easy to follow. Would recommend program to my colleagues. Much appreciated.
•
For someone who has no research background or experience, this was an insightful education into the nuances of grant writing.
•
The clarity of presenter’s message was terrific.
•
Outstanding speaker, easy to follow, engaged the audience, gave great examples and I was fortunate to have attended this seminar.
•
Very well organized and clear. Great speaker! A ton of useful information presented in a way that allowed me to grasp/ retain it.
•
Excellent program. I thoroughly enjoyed the seminar and I strongly believe that this seminar will improve my grantsmanship.
•
Great presenter, made a dry topic very interesting. Feel motivated to submit grants, just need to come up with ideas. Very good help!!
•
Excellent, definitely motivating and gives me the sense that I can actually succeed if I just follow the directions.
•
I was here five years ago, was great then, is great now. Relevant, timely.
•
Examples interspersed throughout handout/ presentation were very helpful. "Break-up" of the application process helps to make it less daunting for up and coming new investigators like me!
•
I like the way you break it down, the sections, the tips are good, it’s relevant and clear, not abstract. I am interested in science writing/ technical writing and I feel these skills are transposable. I think this seminar should be required for PI’s, grad students, and laboratory managers.
•
Exceedingly helpful. Outlines so many mistakes I would have made and how to avoid/ correct them. Fantastic!
•
[The presenter] is clearly very experienced in this topic, but he also has an excellent and well organized presentation style. Although directed to Federal Grants, this information is applicable to smaller grants, but even more widely to developing projects and writing manuscripts.
•
Excellent speaker, well prepped, well updated, knowledgeable on subject. I learned a lot and this was highly applicable and helpful.
•
Outstanding, very up to date and helpful!


Testimonials


National Institutes of Health

Children's Mercy Healthcare

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

University of South Florida, School of Medicine

University of Toledo

Iowa State University

University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

University of Cincinnati

University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station

University of North Texas

Wayne State University

Ontario Genomics Institute

University of Houston

Mayo Clinic

San Francisco State University

Oklahoma State University

North Dakota State University

University of Texas at San Antonio

Duke University

Tulane Cancer Center

University of Wisconsin-Madison

University of Wyoming

University of Wyoming

FASEB

West Virginia University

University of Georgia