|
|
The
workbook instructions enabled me to quickly
generate a good initial draft of my specific
aims/overview and objectives: |
|
4.4±0.5 |
|
The Orientation effectively prepared me for the tasks
involved in generating the initial draft: |
4.2±0.6 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.5±0.5 |
| The review and
critique process was effective in helping me improve
the initial draft: |
4.4±0.7 |
| The on-site phase
meetings helped emphasize the thought process of reviewers
and helped the focus of my proposal: |
4.4±0.7 |
| This program would
be useful to have regularly as part of our faculty development
program: |
4.7±0.5 |
|
 |
| The following
are written comments about the workshop (on file): |
| •
|
I thought the strengths of this program were the exact placements
of information in the grant format and the presentation of
the logic that was used to drive this format. |
• |
The presenter
has been extremely helpful in providing insight into writing
a good grant. I think his critiques are the most useful. Overall,
a great course. |
• |
The workshop
helped me streamline the process of preparing a research proposal.
The exercise has proved helpful in critiquing other’s work.
Much of the information presented can be applied to scientific
writing, such as preparation of manuscripts, reviews, etc. |
|
• |
Basically,
you can fill out a form with all high marks; no make that
exceptional marks from me. The course was bloody wicked helpful,
probably the best single short course I have ever attended
and one that will reap benefits sooner or later. Basically
the old chap was bloody marvelous and both the chemistry and
medical chemical departments along with the MOBI, HBC and
KUCR should sponsor him for a course every other year or more
if necessary. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Testimonials
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professor
Natural Resources &
Environmental Sciences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
