Programs Include:




Print this page
Email this page
Send Feedback


WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY

 

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.4±0.7
The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:
4.9±0.1
The presenter was responsive to questions:
4.9±0.2
The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:
4.5±0.7
The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:
4.7±0.5
This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:
4.8±0.4
The following are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
•
(The presenter) is a very engaging presenter. I learned a lot and enjoyed the process of learning it.
•
Very good. Useful information. Good introductory course for those of us who have never tackled a grant application. Thank you. Well worth my time.
Very helpful suggestions, especially for the beginner.
•
Very helpful suggestions, especially for the beginner.
•
Very informative. He kept it interesting and was responsive to the needs and questions of attendees. Good use of humor-not too much- only added to presentation.
•
It is a good presentation.
•
Let’s repeat these seminars semi-annually. Bravo.
•
Great presentation. Loved it. Thanks.
•
Excellent! Really enjoyed the hands on activity, Thought this was very helpful.
•
Thank you. Great info with dynamic presentation style.
•
Interesting and helpful. I learned a lot.
•
Excellent!!
•
Best grant workshop I’ve attended.
•
Has potential to provide students entering the practicum proposal class valuable guidance.
•
Outstanding. [The presenter] is a highly accomplished NIH funded investigator who is a superbly comprehensive and comprehensible communicator.
•
Well structured, not too overloaded presentation.

Testimonials