|
|
The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated: |
|
4.4±0.8 |
| The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing: |
4.9±0.3 |
| The presenter was responsive to questions: |
4.8±0.4 |
| The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation: |
4.5±0.7 |
| The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally: |
4.8±0.5 |
| This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program: |
4.8±0.7 |
|
 |
The following
are written comments about the seminar
(on file):
|
| •
|
This is the best grant-writing workshop I’ve ever been to.
Extremely well done by someone clearly knowledgeable about
the grant-writing and review process. Presenter was able to
break down the grant application process in an understandable
doable way. I’d recommend this workshop to any level researcher. |
• |
Excellent
information with many helpful details that could give us the
edge. Presenter’s style and stories made a long day go quickly
accompanied by experienced wisdom. Thank you! |
• |
Especially
appreciated “hints” and internet, e-mail funding sources. |
• |
I learned
a great deal about the grant writing process. |
• |
Should be
offered more often (maybe at least twice a year) so everyone
who wants to can take it. |
| • |
Excellent
job - well presented, clear, thorough. Thanks! |
| • |
Very informative;
speaker presented material concisely - I picked up many valuable
tips for grant writing. Thank you for scheduling this seminar. |
• |
Overview was
well presented. |
|
|
|
