Grant Writers' Seminars and Workshops

Programs Include:

Page Tools

Print this page

The University of Wyoming

1=poor > 5=best

The material presented was appropriate for the time allocated:

4.8±0.4

The presenter was knowledgeable on the topic of proposal writing:

5.0±0.0

The presenter was responsive to questions:

4.9±0.4

The visual aids/slides were informative, legible, and helpful to the presentation:

4.4±0.8

The handout was a useful supplement to the information that was presented orally:

4.6±0.7

This program would be useful as a regular part of our faculty/student development program:

4.9±0.4

The following are written comments about the seminar (on file):
•	Great to have so much detail
•	Invaluable information and insights. Worthy of repetition and additional study. Please repeat.
•	[The presenter’s] seminars are by FAR the most useful and helpful grant writing (including NSF and NIH seminars/ workshop). They give a clear, no-nonsense, specific recipe on how to write a good grant. All one needs to do is just follow the “cookbook”. In my case [The presenter’s] workshop and book was what really made the difference. This new seminar is no exception.
•	The seminar is highly successful in highlighting strategies regarding writing successful NIH proposals.
•	The best presentation about winning grants.
•	Good examples were helpful in clarifying concepts. Overall, I can only think how much time it would have taken me to figure out these changes and impacts on my own. Thanks for the opportunity.
•	Extremely knowledgeable and practical advice and well chosen examples. Very strong presentation.
•	Very, very helpful.
•	I found this seminar to be very informative and keeps us ahead of the curve. Thanks for doing this for investigators.
•	Outstanding program. Good material with my level of experience. Not too basic, good focus on changes and strategy.
•	Well done.

Testimonials